British intelligence chiefs are concerned that Russia may have obtained kompromat, compromising material, on Prince Andrew over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
MI6 is understood to be concerned about the activities of a former Florida police officer who had access to the investigation into the billionaire paedophile and then moved to Russia.
The bizarre case of John Mark Dougan, a former deputy in the Palm Beach County sheriff’s office, has provided further evidence that the prince’s repeated efforts to distance himself from allegations of sexual abuse are failing to shield him from the fallout of the Epstein case.
A security source said last week there were concerns at MI6 about how much Dougan knows of the original police investigation into the multimillionaire paedophile’s activities and what…
Carl Beech (left) and Richard Kerr (right) have both linked military officers to a child abuse ring.
Child abuse victim Richard Kerr alleges MI5 (military intelligence) involvement in the abuse at the Kincora children’s home in the UK.
“One of the abusers seemed like he might be an Army captain; he had loads of medals,” Richard Kerr said.
Police officers observed boy prostitutes from ‘the Meat Rack’ in central London being taken to a flat in Cricklewood Broadway, near Hampstead, in London.
Among those that the police saw entering this flat in Cricklewood were:
Report by ‘Operation Conifer’about it https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/13761/view/WTP000005.pdf … and https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/13757/view/WTP000014.pdf …
Cressida Dick (centre) with the UK Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists.
Britain’s top cop is Cressida Dick.
Lesbian Cressida Dick and the Chief Rabbi.
Who controls Cressida Dick?
Cressida Dick is a member of ‘Common Purpose‘.
‘Phoenix was ritually abused at an elite London school’.
King’s House School is in Richmond in London.
I’m going to @BackBoris because I believe he supports our campaign.
8:49 am – 8 Jul 2019
Boris (Johnson) will put the break on IICSA (Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse) legal gravy train.
11:31 pm – 26 May 2019
‘LORD JANNER RAPED A CHILD AGED 8-11 YEARS OLD’
“Janner used his holiday home on the south coast to entertain teenage boys, according to former neighbours …
“A man has come forward to describe how he was abused at a club in the 1970s.
“The man said Janner befriended him when he was eight by buying him ‘pop and crisps’ while his single mother was at work.
“But within months the then-Labour MP allegedly began sexually assaulting him in a ‘secret room’ at the club.
“The alleged victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said the abuse continued until he went to secondary school aged 11 …”
Priti Patel is famous for holding secret meetings with the Israeli government.
Boris Johnson ‘may be the most pro-Israel prime minister in history’ – Haaretz
Carl Beech claimed that Lord Leon Brittan, of Lithuanian Jewish heritage, was a child rapist.
In 1967, Lord Brittan reportedly raped a teenage girl, who looked younger than her years.
Another Member of Parliament accused Brittan of “multiple child rape”.
Carl Beech accused Sir Peter Hayman (Heiman) of child sexual abuse.
The media is now pretending that there is no Westminster child abuse ring, as described by Carl Beech.
In the trial of the child abuse whistleblower Carl Beech, the judge blocked the cross-examination of Harvey Proctor, who is alleged to have murdered children.
The police searched Harvey proctor’s home, at the Duke of Rutland’s Belvoir castle.
David Granby, aka the Duke of Rutland, is in Jeffrey Epstein’s Black Book of contacts.
Witness statements show Proctor’s sexual interest in young boys … No prosecution was pursued … A school uniform with a child’s underwear stained in blood … Refusal to provide blood sample … Someone who enjoy inflicting pain for sexual pleasure …
Just for the record, allegations against many of the alleged so called VIP child abusers came from other sources than just Carl Beech. Allegations against Leon Brittan and Greville Janner were laid by other alleged victims, and corroborating evidence was provided.
Why when there are so many more survivors telling the same stories about the same establishment figures as Carl Beech were they not heard in this case?
Peter Jonathan Denby, a former aide to Enoch Powell, was once picked up by police who wanted to question him in connection with a violent gun incident in Mayfair.
Denby’s Islington home was later raided by armed detectives and his Jaguar car, found abandoned in Kent, was blown up by bomb squad officers.
Janner, top right.
Carl Beech named the top Jewish politician Lord Janner as a child abuser.
The police wanted to bring 22 historical charges against Janner dating back to the period between 1969 and 1988.
Police officers were furious when they were blocked from prosecuting Janner.
Above we see the editor of the Daily Mail with Ghislaine Maxwell, alleged Mossad spy.
Why is the media attacking Carl Beech and apparently supporting ‘the Jimmy Savile gang’?
Carl Beech was born in Wrexham, in North Wales, in 1968.
In the 1990s, top policeman Gordon Anglesea was awarded £375,000 in damages after successfully suing news organisations that had linked him to child sexual abuse at Bryn Alyn.
However, Anglesea was guilty.
In October 2016, Gordon Anglesea (above) was found guilty of sexually abusing boys at the North Wales children’s home, Bryn Estyn, and at a young offenders institution.
ANGLESEA GUILTY; BRYN ESTYN; THE BIGGER PICTURE
Ernest Parke was a journalist who named a top person involved in a boy brothel.
Ernest Parke, and some of the boys, ended up in prison.
The ‘toffs’ were not prosecuted.
Anonymous 22 July 2019 at 10:27 comments –
This absurd outcome was a foregone conclusion from the moment the security services realised these true allegations could no longer be completely ‘shut down’ absent a suitable show trial, scapegoat, and accompanying targeted propaganda exercise.
Staggeringly prejudicial reporting of the trial and Carl Beech’s allegations by the spook-infested corporate media had the intended effect.
Week after week, in article after miserable article, the corporate media demonised Carl Beech and sanctified the ‘real’ accused: Harvey Proctor, Lord Bramall, the late Greville Janner and the late Edward Heath, etc.
Those establishment figures were consistently portrayed by the newspapers and broadcasters as ‘distinguished public servants’; as ‘noble gentlemen’; as ‘elderly victims’ ‘crying out for justice’, etc. etc.
Anonymous 22 July 2019 at 10:27 comments –
In a show trial whose outcome was predetermined by the security services, a guilty verdict supports only one conclusion: that the substance of Carl Beech’s claims are 100% correct.
When the security services exert resources at the magnitude we’ve witnessed in the Carl Beech trial – coordinating a UNIFORM NARRATIVE about Mr Beech, his allegations, and the twists-and-turns of the trial through EVERY British newspaper and broadcaster…. the people can be sure that the VIP paedophiles and their allies in the security services are highly rattled.
Beech’s allegations – especially their truthfulness, which is what gives them their power to frighten – have terrified the life out of some very important people indeed.
Bad luck, spooks, assets, and rent-a-hacks. We still believe Carl. You’ve failed yet again. And we are totally undeterred in our pursuit of justice.
Carl Beech blew the whistle on Harvey Proctor.
Journalist Mark Watts writes:
The ‘Jewish’ judge kept information hidden from the jury?
Carl Beech, among others, accused Lord Janner of being involved in child sexual abuse.
Gilad Atzmon writes:
“In Britain, the independent inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, pretty much collapsed when LORD JANNER became a centre of its focus.
“Lord Janner was a former chairman of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a body that claims to represent British Jews.
“He was also the founder of the Holocaust Memorial Trust.
“Some people, so it seems, are either above the law or beyond scrutiny.
“We may have to admit that in a world where THE LABOUR PARTY is terrorised, in the open, by a foreign lobby, in a world where PENGUIN PRESS stops publishing a book because it referred to the Rothschilds as an ‘influential Jewish family’, in a world where [THE BBC] is reduced to a Zionist propaganda unit, no one in proximity to power dares to look into the possibility that the intelligence agency of a close ally might have invested millions if not billions of dollars in the formation of a spectacular blackmail apparatus that abused underage children through sex trafficking …”
Carl Beech reminds us of Virginia Roberts.
Both have been threatened for acting as whistleblowers on elite child sexual abuse.
According to Virginia Roberts, who worked for Donald Trump:
“There were about eight guys perhaps for whom Virginia provided massages…”
When asked to name the eight men, Virginia grew scared and refused to identify them.
“No, not at this stage, I just – some of these people are really influential and powerful…
“I’m really scared of where this is going.”
“‘LORD BRAMALL ANSWERED ALL QUESTIONS FULLY AND TRUTHFULLY, gave details, spoke about his life, spoke about things intimately personal to him.
“‘Compare what he was to say and the manner in which he was to say it, to this defendant, Carl Beech, shifting, shuffling and lying, and deceiving and dancing and twisting and twirling and running’ …”
Also, what a cheap and tawdry tactic, if you don’t mind my saying so, ‘Tone’.
(Tony. Is that what you like to be referred to when you’re pretending to be an or’nery man of the people, like?)
To invite comparison between – on one hand – a decorated war veteran of advanced age, with an elite education, a peerage, upper-class speech patterns and mannerisms, associations with royalty, and a heart-rending sob story.
An extremely vulnerable man, having his entire life and every real failing dissected and chewed over with relish by the lip-smacking wolves of the media, who couldn’t give a hoot about abused children, torture, and unsolved murders – just so long as they continue to please the cartel.
Carl Beech is accused of damaging the reputation of Jimmy Savile and other top friends of Israel.
It’s sick, but it’s also ironic. These were the same tactics allegedly deployed by the likes of Bramall, Harvey Proctor and Edward Heath to avoid detection back in the day. ‘Nobody will ever believe those powerless, rough accented boys from the care homes, when powerful, upper-class men like ourselves deny and scoff at everything’.
So the same old wheeze is wheeled out again. And again. And again.
No wonder Britain’s paedophile network has been so successful.
But you know that very well, already. Don’t you, Tonee?
Child abuse organiser Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath.
Carl Beech (Nick) accused former UK Prime Minister Edward Heath, and others, of child abuse.
Carl Beech (Nick) ‘s Defence counsel Ray Tully tells the NickTrial that it is agreed with prosecution that Wiltshire Police examined Edward Heath’s close-protection logs, but these were missing for a period during 1970’s and 1980’s.
In Rochdale, in Yorkshire, in the UK, Amber, aged 15, was sexually abused by a gang.
Amber was arrested.
Amber and her friends were written off as ‘unreliable witnesses’.
There is a belief that the child abuse gang was being protected by the police.
Child abuse whistleblower Carl Beech who was arrested by the police.
An investigation in the town of Rotherham in Yorkshire in the UK, found that at least 1,400 children were sexually abused over a period of 16 years.
Rotherham child exploitation report – 26 August 2014
The police and social services turned a blind eye.
Sometimes the police harassed those who were whistleblowers.
Reports on the child abuse, by various officials, were suppressed.
There is a belief that the security services use certain child abuse gangs to recruit Moslems for ‘inside jobs’.
Reportedly, Sir Jimmy Savile, whose main base was Yorkshire, worked for the intelligence services.
CYRIL SMITH COVER UP – SAVILE’S TEAMS – Aangirfan
Carl Beech has accused Harvey Proctor of being part of a top UK child abuse ring.
The Duke and Duchess of Rutland are in Jeffrey Epstein’s Black Book.
The Duke and Duchess of Rutland are the benefactors of Harvey Proctor, who has been linked to child abuse.
Continued here: EPSTEIN’S BLACK BOOK and the HANSON family and other top people.
Anthony Royle was MP for Richmond in Surrey, the home of Britain’s infamous Elm Guest House child brothel until the year after it was raised by Met police.
His daughter Lucinda features in Epstein’s telephone book.
Carl Beech has referred to the Elm Guest House boy brothel.
Lord Bramall told the police that he did not know Lord Janner.
But, Bramall had had a fight with Janner.
In May 2019, Carl Beech was put on trial for ‘telling lies’ about top people.
In court, Carl Beech has admitted that he got wrong some of the details of what happened 40 years ago.
Aangirfan has a friend who often tells the tale of his visit, many years ago, to San Diego.
Each time the tale is told, there are slight differences in the details.
There is some fiction, along with fact.
Asked why he told Wiltshire Police that he did not know why he passed out during abuse, when he later said that it was because his head was held under water, Carl Beech (Nick) tells the NickTrial: “Some things were just too hard to do at that stage.”
Carl Beech (Nick) accepts at the NickTrial that he told Wiltshire Police of someone with a Canadian accent when he meant an American, John Louis.
Why did Carl Beech tell Wiltshire Police that he did not know with what the abusers stabbed and burnt his feet, when he later said drawing pins/lighter.
Carl Beech tells the NickTrial that he did not know and was later giving an indication of what he thinks that it may have been.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he when he told Wiltshire Police that he met John on a building site at the end of his road, this was untrue.
Carl Beech confirms to the NickTrial that he did not go to school with John, ‘who was present when the third child was killed’.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he wrote in a journal that he never saw John with any bruises and yet also claims that he saw him in hospital, and that he wrote he was a friend at school even though he did not go to school with him.
Carl Beech agrees at the NickTrial that “there were a series of fictions” in the chapter in his journal about his friend John.
Carl Beech agrees at the NickTrial that he “told many lies” to, and “withheld important information” from, the Wiltshire Police.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he told Wiltshire Police that John was not at any of the abuse in London even though he said to the Met (London police) that John was.
Carl Beech tells the NickTrial that one location for abuse was the Saudi embassy.
Asked who were the Saudi diplomats who sexualy abused him, he says Abdullah and Turki.
Defendant tells #NickTrial that he also saw Turki sexually abuse John.
It just so happens that Stowe is linked to an array of individuals with links to the alleged VIP paedophile network.
Clearly Beech isn’t making this up.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he lied to Wiltshire Police “in certain areas” and that he sent them off to look for what the prosecutor called “a non-existant witness”.
Prosecutor presses Carl Beech to tell #NickTrial about being taken abroad.
Very reluctantly and hesitatingly, defendant says that he was flown… to Paris… on a private 747… but says that he cannot recall who was on the plane.
Prosecutor asks defendant at #NickTrial why when he told the Met (London police) that his step-father raped him for the first time at a wildlife park he made no mention of John.
“Because I didn’t want to tell them about,” is the reply.
Asked whether it was a lie, defendant says that it was an “omission”.
The Scottish government has scrapped its controversial plan to appoint a named person to safeguard the welfare of every child in the country.
The scheme, which was branded a “snooper’s charter” by opponents, was due to be introduced three years ago.
But it was delayed when the Supreme Court ruled that part of the plan breached Human Rights laws.
Education Secretary John Swinney has now confirmed that he will withdraw the named person legislation.
The Conservatives said the move was a “complete humiliation” for the government.
They called on Mr Swinney to apologise for the “millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money that has been wasted” and to “all the professionals on the front line who have been faced with endless bureaucracy around this policy”.
The scheme would have seen a named person – usually a teacher or health visitor – act as a clear point of contact for every child from birth until the age of 18.
In its ruling in July 2016, the Supreme Court said the aim of the policy was “unquestionably legitimate and benign”, but that proposals around information-sharing breached the right to privacy and a family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The judges said the proposals meant it was “perfectly possible” that confidential information about a young person could be disclosed to a “wide range of public authorities without either the child or young person or her parents being aware”.
Mr Swinney subsequently set up an expert panel which was tasked with finding a way of making named person compatible with the Supreme Court ruling.
But the panel was unable to write a workable code of practice on information sharing, and concluded that doing so “would not be desirable” as the complexity would make it difficult to understand or apply in practice.
Mr Swinney told the Scottish Parliament on Thursday afternoon that the “mandatory named persons scheme for every child, underpinned by law, will now not happen” and that “we will withdraw our bill and repeal the relevant legislation.”
He said that existing, voluntary schemes that provide a point of contact for support will continue – but only for those councils and health boards that wish to provide them, and only for parents who wish to use them.
Mr Swinney said: “In this way, we will support our children and young people so that they can thrive and rise to the challenges and opportunities that life brings.”
He added: “I believe that today we have taken an important step forward in providing families and practitioners with certainty about how information-sharing can support well-being in a transparent way which respects the rights of everyone.”
Earlier on Thursday, the government launched an investigation after details of Mr Swinney’s statement were leaked in advance to the Herald newspaper.
The government says it is committed to making Scotland “the best place in the world for children to grow up”.
As part of its Getting it Right for Every Child strategy, it proposed giving all children and young people from birth to 18 years access to a named person under the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014.
The named person was intended to be single point of contact if a child or their parents wanted information or advice, or if they wanted to talk about any worries and seek support.
They would also be a point of contact for other services if they had any concerns about a child’s wellbeing.
The law was due to come into force across the country on 31 August 2016 but the policy had already been rolled out in parts of Scotland, including Highland, Edinburgh, Fife, Angus and South Ayrshire.
Why was it so controversial?
The legal challenge was launched by the No to Named Persons (NO2NP) coalition, which includes the Christian Institute, Care (Christian Action Research and Education), Tyme Trust and the Family Education Trust.
The group argued that the named person legislation would lead to “unjustified and unjustifiable state interference with family rights” and that responsibility for monitoring a child’s wellbeing should be the role of the parent, not the state.
Their arguments had previously been dismissed as “hyperbole” by the Court of Session in Edinburgh, which said named person did not diminish the role of parents and had “no effect whatsoever on the legal, moral or social relationships within the family”.
Some organisations warned that the legislation’s wording meant the role of the named person was open to wide interpretation.
And the Scottish Parent Teacher Council published the results of an online survey in 2013 which it said suggested “high levels of concern” from parents about the proposals.
However, children’s charities including Barnardo’s, Aberlour, Action for Children and Children 1st accused opponents of the scheme of making “inaccurate and unjustified” statements about named person.
What has the reaction been?
NO2NP said Mr Swinney’s statement “effectively consigns the detested Big Brother scheme to the legislative dustbin”, and predicted that parents would be “delighted” by the move.
But the group said the government should have ditched the plan “a long time ago and saved a lot of time and a lot of money and a lot of anxiety.”
Scottish Conservative education spokeswoman Liz Smith said: “This is a complete humiliation for the SNP. Common sense should have told them years ago that this policy was both universally unpopular and unworkable.
“In the interim, millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money has been wasted as has the time that should have been spent addressing the challenges facing our most vulnerable children.”
The EIS teaching union said named person was originally conceived as a “genuine attempt to ensure that the protection afforded to vulnerable and at-risk young people across Scotland was as robust as it could be, to ensure that children did not fall through cracks in the system, and to strengthen the support to those with needs requiring a multi-agency approach.
“While legislation is not always the best route to achieving such aims, we must not lose sight of the need that still exists to deliver on that ambition.”
NAMED PERSON, TEACHERS & CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE IN SCOTLAND.