Carl Beech (left) and Richard Kerr (right) have both linked military officers to a child abuse ring.
Child abuse victim Richard Kerr alleges MI5 (military intelligence) involvement in the abuse at the Kincora children’s home in the UK.
“One of the abusers seemed like he might be an Army captain; he had loads of medals,” Richard Kerr said.
Police officers observed boy prostitutes from ‘the Meat Rack’ in central London being taken to a flat in Cricklewood Broadway, near Hampstead, in London.
Among those that the police saw entering this flat in Cricklewood were:
The police officers were then told by a senior officer that thay were no longer to investigate the flat in Cricklewood.
Report by ‘Operation Conifer’about it https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/13761/view/WTP000005.pdf … and https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/13757/view/WTP000014.pdf …
Cressida Dick (centre) with the UK Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists.
Britain’s top cop is Cressida Dick.
Cressida Dick had a key role in the probe into Carl Beech, aka Nick, the child abuse ring whistleblower.
Cressida Dick had a key role in the events which led to the murder, by the authorities, of the innocent Brazilian plumber Jean Charles de Menezes, whom the authorities wished to label as being a terrorist.
Lesbian Cressida Dick and the Chief Rabbi.
Who controls Cressida Dick?
Cressida Dick is a member of ‘Common Purpose‘.
‘Phoenix was ritually abused at an elite London school’.
King’s House School is in Richmond in London.
I’m going to @BackBoris because I believe he supports our campaign.
He said: “an awful lot of money, an awful lot of police time goes into these historic offences and all this malarkey – £60m I saw being spaffed (ejaculated) up the wall on some investigation into historic child abuse”
8:49 am – 8 Jul 2019
Boris (Johnson) will put the break on IICSA (Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse) legal gravy train.
11:31 pm – 26 May 2019
‘LORD JANNER RAPED A CHILD AGED 8-11 YEARS OLD’
“Janner used his holiday home on the south coast to entertain teenage boys, according to former neighbours …
“A man has come forward to describe how he was abused at a club in the 1970s.
“The man said Janner befriended him when he was eight by buying him ‘pop and crisps’ while his single mother was at work.
“But within months the then-Labour MP allegedly began sexually assaulting him in a ‘secret room’ at the club.
“The alleged victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said the abuse continued until he went to secondary school aged 11 …”
Boris Johnson ‘may be the most pro-Israel prime minister in history’ – Haaretz
Carl Beech claimed that Lord Leon Brittan, of Lithuanian Jewish heritage, was a child rapist.
A court found Carl Beech guilty of lying.
In 1967, Lord Brittan reportedly raped a teenage girl, who looked younger than her years.
He said he had spoken to two people who claimed they were sexually abused by Brittan.
The ‘Jewish’ judge in the trial of the whistleblower Carl Beech did not allow the jury to see certain evidence.
The media is now pretending that there is no Westminster child abuse ring, as described by Carl Beech.
Carl Beech was put on trial after accusing Harvey Proctor of being a violent child abuser. Harvey Proctor had a sexual interest in children. Proctor can be a Jewish name.
In the trial of the child abuse whistleblower Carl Beech, the judge blocked the cross-examination of Harvey Proctor, who is alleged to have murdered children.
The police searched Harvey proctor’s home, at the Duke of Rutland’s Belvoir castle.
David Granby, aka the Duke of Rutland, is in Jeffrey Epstein’s Black Book of contacts.
The Duke of Rutland has been close to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Witness statements show Proctor’s sexual interest in young boys … No prosecution was pursued … A school uniform with a child’s underwear stained in blood … Refusal to provide blood sample … Someone who enjoy inflicting pain for sexual pleasure …
Just for the record, allegations against many of the alleged so called VIP child abusers came from other sources than just Carl Beech. Allegations against Leon Brittan and Greville Janner were laid by other alleged victims, and corroborating evidence was provided.
Why when there are so many more survivors telling the same stories about the same establishment figures as Carl Beech were they not heard in this case?
Peter Jonathan Denby, a former aide to Enoch Powell, was once picked up by police who wanted to question him in connection with a violent gun incident in Mayfair.
Denby’s Islington home was later raided by armed detectives and his Jaguar car, found abandoned in Kent, was blown up by bomb squad officers.
There is a suspicion that Harvey Proctor is being protected by the security services because of possible links to the illegal arms trade.
Janner, top right.
Carl Beech named the top Jewish politician Lord Janner as a child abuser.
The police wanted to bring 22 historical charges against Janner dating back to the period between 1969 and 1988.
Police officers were furious when they were blocked from prosecuting Janner.
Above we see the editor of the Daily Mail with Ghislaine Maxwell, alleged Mossad spy.
Why is the media attacking Carl Beech and apparently supporting ‘the Jimmy Savile gang’?
NICK VERSUS LORD BRAMALL (PART 1) / NICK VERSUS LORD BRAMALL (PART 2) /
NICK VERSUS LORD BRAMALL (Part 3) / NICK VERSUS LORD BRAMALL (PART 4)
NICK VERSUS LORD BRAMALL (PART 5) . / EPSTEIN, MAXWELL AND CARL BEECH
Carl Beech, the only son of Robert and Charmian Gass, is a whistleblower on child sexual abuse.
Carl Beech was born in Wrexham, in North Wales, in 1968.
In the 1990s, top policeman Gordon Anglesea was awarded £375,000 in damages after successfully suing news organisations that had linked him to child sexual abuse at Bryn Alyn.
However, Anglesea was guilty.
In October 2016, Gordon Anglesea (above) was found guilty of sexually abusing boys at the North Wales children’s home, Bryn Estyn, and at a young offenders institution.
ANGLESEA GUILTY; BRYN ESTYN; THE BIGGER PICTURE
Ernest Parke was editor of the North London Press. He published a story naming Lord Euston as a person involved in the boy brothel. And he suggested that a much more important person was involved.
Ernest Parke was a journalist who named a top person involved in a boy brothel.
Ernest Parke, and some of the boys, ended up in prison.
The ‘toffs’ were not prosecuted.
Anonymous 22 July 2019 at 10:27 comments –
This absurd outcome was a foregone conclusion from the moment the security services realised these true allegations could no longer be completely ‘shut down’ absent a suitable show trial, scapegoat, and accompanying targeted propaganda exercise.
Staggeringly prejudicial reporting of the trial and Carl Beech’s allegations by the spook-infested corporate media had the intended effect.
Week after week, in article after miserable article, the corporate media demonised Carl Beech and sanctified the ‘real’ accused: Harvey Proctor, Lord Bramall, the late Greville Janner and the late Edward Heath, etc.
Those establishment figures were consistently portrayed by the newspapers and broadcasters as ‘distinguished public servants’; as ‘noble gentlemen’; as ‘elderly victims’ ‘crying out for justice’, etc. etc.
Anonymous 22 July 2019 at 10:27 comments –
In a show trial whose outcome was predetermined by the security services, a guilty verdict supports only one conclusion: that the substance of Carl Beech’s claims are 100% correct.
When the security services exert resources at the magnitude we’ve witnessed in the Carl Beech trial – coordinating a UNIFORM NARRATIVE about Mr Beech, his allegations, and the twists-and-turns of the trial through EVERY British newspaper and broadcaster…. the people can be sure that the VIP paedophiles and their allies in the security services are highly rattled.
Beech’s allegations – especially their truthfulness, which is what gives them their power to frighten – have terrified the life out of some very important people indeed.
We’ve all seen the consequences of this: the massive cover-up, and the retribution unleashed on Beech in the form of the media’s pathetic attempts at humiliating him (branding him a ‘fantasist’ ad infinitum, showing his personal photos, etc.)
Bad luck, spooks, assets, and rent-a-hacks. We still believe Carl. You’ve failed yet again. And we are totally undeterred in our pursuit of justice.
Carl Beech blew the whistle on Harvey Proctor.
Journalist Mark Watts writes:
The ‘Jewish’ judge kept information hidden from the jury?
Carl Beech, among others, accused Lord Janner of being involved in child sexual abuse.
Gilad Atzmon writes:
“In Britain, the independent inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, pretty much collapsed when LORD JANNER became a centre of its focus.
“Lord Janner was a former chairman of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a body that claims to represent British Jews.
“He was also the founder of the Holocaust Memorial Trust.
“Some people, so it seems, are either above the law or beyond scrutiny.
“We may have to admit that in a world where THE LABOUR PARTY is terrorised, in the open, by a foreign lobby, in a world where PENGUIN PRESS stops publishing a book because it referred to the Rothschilds as an ‘influential Jewish family’, in a world where [THE BBC] is reduced to a Zionist propaganda unit, no one in proximity to power dares to look into the possibility that the intelligence agency of a close ally might have invested millions if not billions of dollars in the formation of a spectacular blackmail apparatus that abused underage children through sex trafficking …”
Carl Beech reminds us of Virginia Roberts.
Both have been threatened for acting as whistleblowers on elite child sexual abuse.
According to Virginia Roberts, who worked for Donald Trump:
“There were about eight guys perhaps for whom Virginia provided massages…”
When asked to name the eight men, Virginia grew scared and refused to identify them.
“No, not at this stage, I just – some of these people are really influential and powerful…
“I’m really scared of where this is going.”
Tony Badenoch, who is leading the prosecution of Carl Beech.
“Prosecutor Tony Badenoch QC said:
“‘LORD BRAMALL ANSWERED ALL QUESTIONS FULLY AND TRUTHFULLY, gave details, spoke about his life, spoke about things intimately personal to him.
“‘Compare what he was to say and the manner in which he was to say it, to this defendant, Carl Beech, shifting, shuffling and lying, and deceiving and dancing and twisting and twirling and running’ …”
Ha ha ha. Well, if you say so.
Also, what a cheap and tawdry tactic, if you don’t mind my saying so, ‘Tone’.
(Tony. Is that what you like to be referred to when you’re pretending to be an or’nery man of the people, like?)
To invite comparison between – on one hand – a decorated war veteran of advanced age, with an elite education, a peerage, upper-class speech patterns and mannerisms, associations with royalty, and a heart-rending sob story.
A man with no titles, no peerage, no upper-class diction, appearance or mannerisms. No associations with royalty. A man totally unpracticed in functioning at the centre of public attention – in complete contrast to the powerful men he is accusing of the most vile crimes, who got to spend decades mastering their public images whilst performing jobs in the glare of the mass media.
An extremely vulnerable man, having his entire life and every real failing dissected and chewed over with relish by the lip-smacking wolves of the media, who couldn’t give a hoot about abused children, torture, and unsolved murders – just so long as they continue to please the cartel.
Carl Beech is accused of damaging the reputation of Jimmy Savile and other top friends of Israel.
So the same old wheeze is wheeled out again. And again. And again.
No wonder Britain’s paedophile network has been so successful.
Child abuse organiser Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath.
Carl Beech (Nick) accused former UK Prime Minister Edward Heath, and others, of child abuse.
Carl Beech (Nick) ‘s Defence counsel Ray Tully tells the NickTrial that it is agreed with prosecution that Wiltshire Police examined Edward Heath’s close-protection logs, but these were missing for a period during 1970’s and 1980’s.
In Rochdale, in Yorkshire, in the UK, Amber, aged 15, was sexually abused by a gang.
Amber was arrested.
Amber and her friends were written off as ‘unreliable witnesses’.
There is a belief that the child abuse gang was being protected by the police.
Child abuse whistleblower Carl Beech who was arrested by the police.
An investigation in the town of Rotherham in Yorkshire in the UK, found that at least 1,400 children were sexually abused over a period of 16 years.
Rotherham child exploitation report – 26 August 2014
The police and social services turned a blind eye.
Sometimes the police harassed those who were whistleblowers.
Reports on the child abuse, by various officials, were suppressed.
There is a belief that the security services use certain child abuse gangs to recruit Moslems for ‘inside jobs’.
CYRIL SMITH COVER UP – SAVILE’S TEAMS – Aangirfan
Carl Beech has accused Harvey Proctor of being part of a top UK child abuse ring.
The Duke and Duchess of Rutland are in Jeffrey Epstein’s Black Book.
The Duke and Duchess of Rutland are the benefactors of Harvey Proctor, who has been linked to child abuse.
Continued here: EPSTEIN’S BLACK BOOK and the HANSON family and other top people.
Anthony Royle was MP for Richmond in Surrey, the home of Britain’s infamous Elm Guest House child brothel until the year after it was raised by Met police.
His daughter Lucinda features in Epstein’s telephone book.
Carl Beech has referred to the Elm Guest House boy brothel.
Lord Bramall told the police that he did not know Lord Janner.
But, Bramall had had a fight with Janner.
The police say that ‘John’, a witness, does not exist.
Nick says the Met police were in e-mail contact with ‘John’.
Witnesses vary their stories?In May 2019, Carl Beech was put on trial for ‘telling lies’ about top people.
In court, Carl Beech has admitted that he got wrong some of the details of what happened 40 years ago.
Aangirfan has a friend who often tells the tale of his visit, many years ago, to San Diego.
Each time the tale is told, there are slight differences in the details.
There is some fiction, along with fact.
Asked why he told Wiltshire Police that he did not know why he passed out during abuse, when he later said that it was because his head was held under water, Carl Beech (Nick) tells the NickTrial: “Some things were just too hard to do at that stage.”
Carl Beech (Nick) accepts at the NickTrial that he told Wiltshire Police of someone with a Canadian accent when he meant an American, John Louis.
Why did Carl Beech tell Wiltshire Police that he did not know with what the abusers stabbed and burnt his feet, when he later said drawing pins/lighter.
Carl Beech tells the NickTrial that he did not know and was later giving an indication of what he thinks that it may have been.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he when he told Wiltshire Police that he met John on a building site at the end of his road, this was untrue.
Carl Beech confirms to the NickTrial that he did not go to school with John, ‘who was present when the third child was killed’.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he wrote in a journal that he never saw John with any bruises and yet also claims that he saw him in hospital, and that he wrote he was a friend at school even though he did not go to school with him.
Carl Beech agrees at the NickTrial that “there were a series of fictions” in the chapter in his journal about his friend John.
Carl Beech agrees at the NickTrial that he “told many lies” to, and “withheld important information” from, the Wiltshire Police.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he told Wiltshire Police that John was not at any of the abuse in London even though he said to the Met (London police) that John was.
Carl Beech tells the NickTrial that one location for abuse was the Saudi embassy.
Asked who were the Saudi diplomats who sexualy abused him, he says Abdullah and Turki.
Defendant tells #NickTrial that he also saw Turki sexually abuse John.
Clearly Beech isn’t making this up.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he lied to Wiltshire Police “in certain areas” and that he sent them off to look for what the prosecutor called “a non-existant witness”.
Very reluctantly and hesitatingly, defendant says that he was flown… to Paris… on a private 747… but says that he cannot recall who was on the plane.
Prosecutor asks defendant at #NickTrial why when he told the Met (London police) that his step-father raped him for the first time at a wildlife park he made no mention of John.
“Because I didn’t want to tell them about,” is the reply.
Pressed on why he did not tell the Met about John at the wildlife park, defendant becomes tearful at #NickTrial, saying that he not was not prepared to talk about him.
Asked whether it was a lie, defendant says that it was an “omission”.