balls up

Is the tyranny of the minority upon us, the political class is in uproar regarding the Yaniv case, Trans-gender politics puts the SNP and Nicola Sturgeon under the spotlight, how many times has Nicola Sturgeon and Mhairi Black been in a female changing room and seen a stark naked trans person complete with balls and a penis hanging down with underage females in the same area?

Dear All

The case of Jonathan Yaniv has got people’s knickers in a twist, which has led to the many people in Scotland talking about gender recognition. The SNP wants to bring in an Act that allows people to self ID. Jonathan Yaniv was born a male, being born a male, that means he has a pair of bollocks and a penis.

Now, Jonathan Yaniv goes by the name of Jessica Yaniv and declares to be a woman in Canada, a country which has gone right down the shitter under its Prime Minister.  Yaniv’s fame as a trans activist had a boost recently due to the story that Yaniv used legislation to wreak havoc in the lives of 16 B.C. waxologists. These women earn a modest living by performing intimate hair-removal services for other women.

They refused to wax Yaniv’s testicles.

Yes, Yaniv wanted to lie on a table and have these women ‘manhandle’ the balls and penis hanging down.

This refusal has led to a court case which human rights has been used as a stick to beat defence less women with, the pressure Yaniv has brought to bear on them, havs seen some of them abandoned their livelihood.

At the nub of this case is human rights, in order for a human right to be valid, it cannot interfere with someone else’s human right. That is how human rights are supposed to work; basically you cannot coercion someone into doing something by threats. If you don’t then far from enabling human rights, you are actually acting in a criminal manner.

If you haven’t comes across Yaniv before, here is an interview to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3wGIQ49FHQ

In Scotland, the trans debate has seen opposition to the Scottish Government’s reforms, even within the SNP with ‘Joan ‘moan’ McAlpine among those leading the charge. On the other side is Mhairi ‘manky’ Black, the lesbian SNP MP who is reported to have called people who don’t like the reforms allegedly cunts. What is missing in the Scottish debate is an apparent unwillingness for the trans supporting lobby which includes bitter Nicola Sturgeon to answer questions.

Having messed up in politics, Nicola Sturgeon is trying to redefine the meaning of sex and gender. People like her dismiss biological sex as nothing more than something casually assigned at birth, based on whether a baby has a vulva or penis. And the kicker io all this and their argument os that a person’s lived identity,  their gender at any given time is all that matters.

If you disagree with this new doctrine and definition of humanity, largely defined by “transwomen” with penises, then you cannot call yourself a feminist, or even a woman. You are a dismissed as a terf, a trans-exclusionary radical feminist.

The very basis of feminism is supposed to be that  women have been, and continue to be, economically, socially and politically oppressed because of their biology, although this isn’t true because of current laws, we find this has been tossed aside like an old pair of boxer shorts to be replaced by the killer heels of trans activists.

You have to wonder, how many times have Nicola Sturgeon and Mhairi Black been in a female changing room and seen a stark naked trans complete with balls and penis hanging down?

How many times has Nicola Sturgeon and Mhairi Black been in a female changing room and seen a stark naked trans person complete with balls and a penis hanging down with underage females in the same area?

Can Nicola Sturgeon and Mhairi Black explain if there is any difference between a trans person using a female toilet and trans person using a female changing room?

What space would Nicola Sturgeon and Mhairi Black deem as female biological sex only?

None?

It is said that there is a backlash building towards the LGBT movement; this is despite politics being over represented by LGBT people in all parties at senior level who push their LGBT agenda. The effect of this in politics and among society is seen the emergence of an old group with a new twist ‘Straight Pride’.

https://superhappyfunamerica.com/parade/

Apparently this type of event angers some member of the LGBT community.

And it seems that Straight Pride may catch on with California joining in.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/07/25/straight-pride-parade-modesto-california-may-get-approval/1824843001/

Will Yaniv win the case at the Canadian Tribunal?

When you try to force someone to do something against their will you leave the safeguard of human rights protection and enact tyranny. Also, you may find that another concept enters the debate, the difference between ‘Tolerance and Acceptance’. When people are forced by law to tolerate something by remaining silent, they usually end up point blank refusing to entertain the idea of acceptance.

Finally, time for a joke,

A guy get locked up in prison,

He is put in cell with another guy

Later that night the other guys asks

Want to play a game?

The guy says okay

The other guy says mummies and daddies

Thinking quickly the guy says,

‘I will be daddy’.

‘Okay, come over here and suck mummy’s cock’

Yours sincerely

George Laird

The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University

One thought on “balls up

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s