Archive | December 2013

LUCKY GUESS ?

Finally, as regards the letter which was read in the court, I would say this: it did not form part of the pleadings and therefore was not relevant to the debate before me. However, I allowed the defender to read it, insofar as it might raise matters which could be of significance in a general sense in considering the issues before me. I did not find anything in the letter, so far as read to me, which was of such significance.
Nor will you ever My lord! Nothing that Robert Green says has any semblance in rational thought, truth or evidence.

Now we wait to see the conclusion – one that will be very surprising to all we suspect!





WEB

Shedding New Light on Bowen’s Acquaintances

Posted on 27. Jan, 2012 by  in Elish Angiolini, News
Robert Green’s defence in his breach of the peace trial in Stonehaven this week substantially involved witnesses he was not permitted to cross-examine. Sheriff Principal Bowen denied Robert the right to have former Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini take the stand under oath.
We all know he wanted to put Elish Angiolini in the dock because she was allegedly instrumental in the cover-up of abuses against Hollie Greig during her tenure as Regional Procurator Fiscal for the Grampian, Highland and Islands region of Scotland.
Normally in jurisdictions where the law is above board and not tainted by corruption, a judge has to declare affiliations with witnesses and, if necessary, a judge should recuse himself from the proceedings if there is any hint of association.
In a case where one of the witnesses is a high ranking legal official, it stands to reason that a judge may, in the course of the trial, be placed in a situation where their judgement could be prejudicial to his superior(s). This is a difficult situation but it does happen and the impact of any suspected bias could be significantly reduced by having a judge who has had relatively little interaction with any witnesses who may be from within the legal profession.
So, what if Sheriff Principal Bowen had interactions with Elish Angiolini and Frank Mullholland in circumstances beyond their role in the legal profession?
This would surely be a circumstance in which a Defendant had reasonable grounds to request that the judge be recused and replaced with a judge who had less perceived bias.
Sheriff Principal Edward Farquharson Bowen QC sits on the Northern Lighthouse Board alongside Elish Angiolini and Frank Mullholland.
Now, astute readers will note that all Sheriff Principals in Scotland are required to sit on the Northern Lighthouse Board and in that sense, Bowen has no choice in the matter. His role in that instance is an ancient legal function. However, Robert Green’s trial should have taken place with a Sheriff – not a Sheriff Principal.
From Wikipedia:

Judicial Functions

A sheriff principal sometimes sits in criminal courts or conducts major fatal accident inquiries. However, a sheriff principal is primarily an appellate judge who sits alone to determine appeals from the decisions of sheriffs in civil matters. An appeal lies from the sheriff principal to the Inner House of the Court of Session.
In terms of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1971 sheriffs principal are charged with a number of duties in respect of the courts for which they are responsible, including in particular a duty “to secure the speedy and efficient disposal of business in the sheriff courts of that sheriffdom”.
Notwithstanding the various professional affiliations between Sheriff Principal Bowen, Angiolini and Mullholland, why did Bowen preside over Robert Green’s trial? We’ve seen Bowen sit on appeal cases including the one where he let a paedophile go free (here). If his role is more suited to an appellate court then what on earth was he doing defending his legal buddies in a breach of the peace case?
A quick glance at other professional affiliations shows that Sheriff Principal Bowen has worked with Lord Cullen – the master whitewash merchant on the Dunblane Inquiry. In this respect, Bowen was the Chairman of SACRO and Cullen is its Honorary President.
We all know that these people rub shoulders all the time and in the low population of Scotland, this handful of lawmen are bound to be best buddies. But does Bowen have to be so obvious? Are his professional relationships with Angiolini and Mullholland sufficiently strong that he should have recused himself?
Tell us what you think.
Should Sheriff Principal Bowen have recused himself from Robert Green’s Trial?
  •  Yes – he is too involved with the protaganists
  •  No – he is totally honest and impartial

6 Responses to “Shedding New Light on Bowen’s Acquaintances”

  1. 1

    Meg Selby Says: 

    Get Elish Angiolini in the witness stand. Who is she covering for? JUSTICE FOR HOLLIE GREIG!!!
  2. 2

    Barbara Richards Says: 

    How much taxpayers money have they frittered on taking Robert Green to court for the henious “crime” of handing out leaflets in a public place, and how much cash from the same source have they squandered on protecting their paedophile chums? And, once again, where is the media and the BBC?
  3. 3

    Steve Says: 

    This case is one of the biggest misscarrages of justice in recent times & I’m only commenting on what I’ve read. Handing out leaflets is a breach of the peace, These so called “Legal” people are insane in that case. Bowen & Angiolini are “bent” end of story, not to mention countless other people involved with this case, they have ALL conspired to cover up the truth & are a disgrace to the legal system & they should be damn well charged with perverting the course of justice. Robert Green has been well & truly shafted for standing up & doing the right thing, he now has a criminal record with time served in prison & plainly that is not justice…..I really do despair.
  4. 4

    Robert Green – Page 49 – Fresh Horizon Says: 

    […] to this thread so far…. Shedding New Light on Bowen’s Acquaintances|Hollie Greig Hollie Greig|Archive|Events Aberdeen Paedophile Ring|Hollie Greig Trial Day 1: Angiolini still […]
  5. 5

    Mick Says: 

    I think there is much mis-information on both sides here. Green was not charged with ‘breacing the peace’ becaus ehe ahnded out leaflets-it was what was in thsoe leaflets that he was charged for. There is still a law of ‘crimial defamation’ and yiou can be charged with a ‘breach of the peace’ for perpetuating a defamation.
    However of course Robert Green’s leaflets may be entirey truthful and he will eventualy have his day in court to prove that.
    He was also jailed (most unfairly in my view) for breaching his jail conditions and for nothing else.
    Again however-as mr Green has so many supprters and a good legal brief who is a QC why doesn;t eh launch a private prosecution of those involved in the illgeality. They could no longer ignore it then.
  6. 6

    chris Says: 

    As someone who has recently become familiar with these proceedings, i have to say that i am absolutely dumbfounded.
    My heart goes out to those directly involved in this pit of lies and evil.
    It stinks to the high heavens. Not forgetting that all these trials cost money and that is going back into the hands of tge perpetrators. It is quite sickening.
    I for one will raise awareness of this case to friends and family.
    Good luck Hollie.

Leave a Replyhttp://holliegreig.info/2012/01/shedding-new-light-on-bowens-acquaintances/

THE HOLLIE HOAX TEAM AND THE SCOTTISH ESTABLISHMENT

ITS SIMPLE HOLLIE GRIEG WAS ABUSED,SHE HAS TOLE THE SAME STORY FOR YEARS ,SHE WAS AWARDED CRIMINAL  COMPENSATION,THERE IS EVIDENCE SHE WAS ABUSED,THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO JAIL ROBERT GREEN AND RUSTY.

THE HOAX TEAM THINK THIS IS BECAUSE ANNE GREIG IS A RIGHT MOANER SO THE GOVERNMENT THOUGHT IF THEY PAID THE LUNATIC OFF SHE WOULD TAKE HER SECTIONING AND THE MONEY AND PISS OFF.

SO THE TRUTHER HOAX TEAM ARE TAKING THE SIDE OF THE  SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT,THE SAME PEOPLE WHO BROUGHT YOU LOCKERBIE,THE DEATH OF WILLIE MACRAE  AND DUNBLANE,BUT THIS TIME THEY ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?

ROBERT GREENS BLOG

Robert Green’s Blog – Hollie Greig Campaign

 

Tuesday, 31 December 2013

PETER WATSON-UNCROWNED KING OF SCOTLAND?

Throughout the years of the Hollie Greig campaign, there has been one common denominator in my dealings with the Scottish legal establishment. Everyone seems to be terrified of one man in particular – Peter Watson, senior partner of law firm Levy & McRae,

The firm`s own website boasts of many things, including keeping its clients off the front pages. It also states that it represents the biggest names in broadcasting and media in Scotland. Although it does not mention this, Professor Watson also personally represents Alex Salmond and Elish Angiolini, as well as Police Scotland. Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill is a former colleague of Peter Watson at Levy & McRae. Professor Watson is also known to have influential connections with the tax haven of the Cayman Islands.

The boast of keeping its clients off the front pages may indicate to some that it could enable Peter Watson to control, for example, leading politicians, senior police officers, members of the judiciary and legal profession and editors by means of blackmail. Whilst I have no evidence as yet to confirm that this type of coercion has ever occurred, it may not be unreasonable to suggest that Professor Watson is in a position to act in this way should he choose to do so. It may also go some way to explaining why people in Scotland are so frightened of him.

In fairness, concerns about his power and influence have been raised publicly by BBC Scotland`s Legal Head, Alistair Bonnington and by experienced Guardian journalist Roy Greenslade.

I understand that Peter Watson is a regular and loyal reader of this site and once again, I invite him to contact me if he feels that my comments are either inaccurate or unfair and I offer to publish such a response.

Finally, may I again congratulate Kevin Edwards and his supporters in South Wales in successfully exposing the brutal and criminal persecution of young Welsh girl Linda Lewis by the Welsh government. It is also important to salute Assembly Member David Rees for his courage and sense of duty to the people of Wales. If only the Scottish Parliament possessed just one person of Mr Rees`s calibre, the Hollie Greig case would be fully opened up, enabling the Scottish people to form their own opinions on its significance and credibility, an opportunity so far denied to them by its government`s threats against the media. Such threats were issued by none other than Levy & McRae, naturally!

Details of recent events in the Linda Lewis case can be found on the link:-
http://cllrkevinedwards.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/welsh-assembly-government-and-neath.html

It just goes to show that with courage, resolve and skill, national leaders like Carwyn Jones and Alex Salmond can be finally exposed for their misdemeanours in public office.

Happy New Year to you all! http://robertgreensblog-holliegreigcampaign.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/peter-watson-uncrowned-king-of-scotland.html#comment-form

ORDER OF TRUTH HARVEST YOUR IP ADDRESS,FACT!

Order Of Truth
Reply
December 27, 2013 at 12:43 am Reply

Have you got any evidence/proof she was swindled? Of course not. Because you are a troll – how do we know? We have the technology and you are too stupid.

If names were made up then of course they would be wrong names – or is that too obvious for you to understand!! 

So are you going to reveal your real identity and enter into a sensible adult debate, or are you going to continue to hide behind someone else’s hijacked identity (which is illegal by the way – and we have your details) because you are too much of a slimy yellow coward to enter into normal human behaviour – or is it because you KNOW you are wrong? You should also get at least a basic education and learn to spell correctly.

Anything you want to discuss? Like the weather in Glasgow?

For any visitors, we would like to inform you that this idiot troll is posting under the name of Job Stevenson with the name ‘js42uk’ (as you can see from the comments they have made). We have verified that this is not the real Jon Stevenson.
js42uk
Reply
December 30, 2013 at 5:44 pm Reply

You mean hide my IP like I did before from Virgin eh? 

I wanted to see if you would fall for it and you did.

As for spelling thats a bit rich ,Roger Green eh?

Nice to know you are trying to harvest IP addresses,very liberal of you lullzzzzzz.

Stuart usher told me about Anne being swindled and getting compo,dont you ever check your facts?

Whats your real name,Jon Pyrite eh.

http://orderoftruth.wordpress.com/2013/12/20/the-peoples-voice-not-so-much-for-the-people-tpv-thepeoplesvoice-icke-holliegreig/

SHARAN ANN ZAKI BLEATS AGAIN

Sharon Ann Zaki said
Just to expand on Greg’s comments, it has to be said that he gives EVERYONE a right of reply on his comments section. He’s even generous enough to allow you ‘Hollie Greig Justice’ fraudsters a say.

THE HOLLIE HOAX TEAM DO NOT,I CANNAE SEE WHY I SHOULD LET YOU

  I tried to post a comment on the HGJ blog http://holliegreigjustice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/the-hollie-hoax-squad-call-in-the-team.html

. All I was trying to say was:I AM A WORSHIPER OF SATAN AND WILL SELL MY KIDS FOR A DRINK OF BLOOD

 
 
WHAT A BITCH !