Aberdeen minister charged over alleged child assault
52-year-old denies allegation
The opinion was commissioned by Tony Bennett [solicitor]
Political Assistant to Jeffrey Titford MEP [UK Independence Party].
The opinion given is that of Michael Shrimpton Esq. Barrister, who can be contacted via his Chambers:
Francis Taylor Building
Michael Shrimpton, Tony Bennett, Jeffrey Titford MEP and UKIP have agreed that this opinion can be used free of any charge in the defence of Britain against the imposition of Foreign laws alien to British Law, The British Constitution and British standards.
Should you wish to make a contribution for the use of this opinion or in support of this campaign it would be most welcome – Please make cheques payable to:
UKIP Metric Martyr Fund,
C/o Tony Bennett [solicitor],
Rooms 1 & 2, Rochester House,
145 New London Road,
Should you wish to join UKIP and support their efforts to defend Britain against foreign and alien rule, against the wishes of The British peoples and in contravention of The British Constitution, please address your enquiry via Tony Bennett – address as above.
All funds raised by ‘The UK Independence Campaign Metric Martyr Fund’ will be fully accounted and will be used to assist in the prosecution of the right of British citizens to deal in Imperial Measurements, as is their right under law, free of harassment as a result of illegal attempts to impose Foreign Laws alien to British Common Law. It seems likely that the first case to require assistance will be of a greengrocer in Sunderland who will be prosecuting Sunderland Council for the return of his scales removed illegally by a Sunderland Trading Standards apparatchick.
Your support would be most welcome.
with the full authority of the solicitors aforementioned.
You may download this information and use it with no further permission required.
Should you have any further queries or require facts on any other aspect of the corrupt, undemocratic, over bureaucratised centralised European Dictatorship known as the EU and the awesome damage being to these United Kingdoms by the EU please do not hesitate to contact me:
Greg Lance – Watkins,
Cynulliad i Gymru
[trans.: THE WELSH ASSEMBLY],
c/o Glance Back Books,
17 Upper Church Street,
On 6th July 2011, he was interviewed by BBC Newsnight and described Scotland`s record on human rights as appalling. For this shocking state of affairs, he primarily blamed Elish Angiolini, followed by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill. Mr Hamilton goes on to strongly condemn them over the Peter Cadder case, by which approximately 76,000 people were unsafely convicted. I was one of those, denied my human rights, in direct contradiction of Scotland`s own legal commitments, by DS Drummond and DC Crowder on 12th February 2010, when they refused me the legal representation to which I was entitled when I was charged. Another glaring example of Angiolini`s and MacAskill`s utter contempt for fundamental human rights lay in the circumstances connected with the false conviction and imprisonment of Mr Al-Megrahi in the notorious Lockerbie case.
Mr Hamilton`s interview can be seen thus:-
Many observers who have been following the Hollie Greig case are at a loss to understand why the Scottish mainstream media barely ever mentions the issue, even when connected criminal cases are involved, such as those of Tim Rustige (Rusty) and mine. The police officers from Operation Yewtree seemed puzzled that at the height of the Jimmy Savile scandal that no mention or photographs at all were published in the Scottish media when his cottage in Glencoe was prominently daubed “Justice for Hollie Greig”.
One possible explanation for the existence of this blanket of secrecy may lie in the person of Peter Watson, senior partner of solicitors Levy & McRae. The firm claims to specialise in managing unwelcome publicity affecting its clients. It states that “we aim to keep our clients off the front page”. This is certainly no idle boast. It is clearly very successful in that regard.
Professor Watson acts for Elish Angiolini and personally represents First Minister Alex Salmond. Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill is a former colleague when working as a solicitor at Levy & McRae. When Chief Constable Sir Stephen House was head of Strathclyde Police, Levy & McRae represented the Police Federation of that force. Now Sir Stephen leads Police Scotland, Levy & McRae now represent the Federation covering the entire country. The firm also acts for the Scottish Prison Officers Association. Professor Watson even acts as a part-time sheriff.
Levy & McRae`s power and influence does not end there, by any means.
Professor Watson is a key advisor to Alex Salmond in his efforts to further control the Scottish media. The firm represents a good part of the media, including Scottish TV, the Daily Record, Herald Scotland and others. In fact, Levy & McRae states that it represents “the biggest names in print and broadcast media”. Is it any surprise then that issues damaging to Elish Angiolini, such as the Hollie Greig case, may never see the light of day?
It must be said that Levy & McRae has received many glowing accolades from satisfied clients and in 2008, Peter Watson, described as “brilliant”, was voted Solicitor of the Year.
All this is, no doubt, wonderful for Professor Watson and for Levy & McRae, but could any of these wide-ranging spheres of influence constitute potential conflicts of interest in the way that Scotland is governed, possible effects on policing, the justice system and matters of genuine public interest being concealed from the people of Scotland?
If I have omitted any other remaining powerful organisations or individuals in Scotland that Levy &
McRae represent, I sincerely apologise
For anyone not familiar with this exhibit, it originated with Métis artist Christi Belcourt, who was looking for a way to raise awareness about the 600+ missing or murdered Indigenous women in Canada. Her original plan was to have 600 moccasin vamps (uppers) made to symbolically represent these women.
WHEN ASKED FOR “PROOF AND EVIDENCE” OF JUST ONE DEATH WELL THE BLOGGER WENT OFF ON A RANT SAYING WE HAD ABUSED HER AND WE ARE FAKE AND HOLLIES DOCUMENTED ABUSE IS FAKE .
WHILE WE DONT DOUBT THAT THIS ABUSE DID GO ON HOW COME C OF C DONT NEED
EVIDENCE OF THAT FOR THEIR ITEMS BUT DENY HOLLIE GRIEGS EVIDENCE
DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS BUT IT SEEMS THE SAUCE FOR THE GOOSE IS NOT SAUCE FOR THE GANDER!