#purple diary dates It’s good to plan ahead ! Give schools and Councils etc time to plan !! NOW COVERING ALL ASPECTS OF CHILD ABUSE !! #purplesummer Friday June 15th #purplechristmas Friday December 7th Raise massive awareness of all forms of Child Abuse !
43 year old, Nicholas Fisher, has been found guilty of sexually assaulting 2 girls.
They were under 13 years of age.
Fisher possessed 3 “paedophile manuals”.
These guides “help” paedophiles groom and abuse children.
He was also found guilty of 8 charges for making indecent images of children.
Fisher was sentenced to 2 and a half years in prison.
Practices that Risk Children Baked into Court Procedures: Part 2
By Barry Goldstein
The Stop Abuse Campaign is happy to present the rest of Barry Goldstein’s piece “Practices that Risk Children Baked into Court Procedures”. Today’s piece focuses on how to fix the problem.
Standard Practices that Encourage Disbelief of True Domestic Violence Reports
- The Myth Mothers Make Frequent False Abuse Reports: The Saunders’ Study found that evaluators, lawyers and judges without the needed knowledge and training regarding domestic violence tend to focus on the myth of mothers making frequent false abuse reports and unscientific alienation theories. This leads to decisions that hurt children. Research establishes that in the context of contested custody less than 2% of abuse reports by mothers are deliberately false. The same research established that fathers in contested custody cases are 16 times more likely to make deliberate false reports. It is not that men are 16 times more dishonest than women, but rather contested custody overwhelmingly involves the worst abusers who believe they are entitled to use any tactic necessary to regain control over their partners. Parental Alienation Syndrome which is often used by other names like alienation or parental alienation because of its notoriety, is based on the false assumption that virtually every report of abuse is false. Many courts continue to use alienation despite the lack of scientific support based on the “common sense” belief that of course some parents try to undermine the relationship between the children and the other parent. One problem with this approach is that it just assumes substantial harm rather than requiring proof of specific harm. The ACE Research suggests that unless the “alienation” results in taking a parent out of a child’s life it does not rise to a health or safety issue. In most cases any damage is short-lived. Another problem is that reporting domestic violence and even making sure children understand it is wrong is not alienation and is beneficial for children to know. The myth is often self-fulfilling as professionals expecting to find false reports reach this conclusion far too frequently. When PAS is used, including by another name, the alienation is assumed from the bad relationship between father and child rather than based on proof of what the mother said or did. More likely explanations for the problem are ignored or discarded. Even when the judge knows not to believe the myth, they may be relying on evaluators or lawyers who used the myth without articulating this mistake. The myth is a poison in the court system that encourages mistakes the err on the side of risking children.
- Missing the Context: Context is critical to understand domestic violence, but fundamental jurisprudence requires that courts consider each issue and each case separately. There is nothing in the law that would prevent use of best practices to look for patterns, but this is often missed. It is conceivable that someone could commit one act of domestic violence and then stop or that an abuser can stop without effective intervention, but such scenarios are extremely unlikely. When there are one or more incidents of abuse that cannot be denied abusers will argue for this rare circumstance and professionals without an understanding of domestic violence dynamics accept this unlikely claim. Teachers routinely use common sense to know that “the dog ate my homework” is usually a false excuse, but are open to the rare exception such as a note from a parent that this actually occurred. Judges could use similar common sense if they were better informed of the dynamics.
- End of Relationship Does Not End Risk: Domestic violence tactics are not responses to incidents, but based on beliefs and entitlement to control. Many court professionals wrongly assume that the end of the relationship also ends the risk. This is why the Saunders’ Study recommends training in post-separation violence. We know the end of a relationship is the most dangerous time for a woman because 75% of women killed by their partners lose their lives after they leave. It also explains the large number of children killed by abusive fathers during custody disputes because it is the best way to hurt the mother. The litigation and economic abuse that often occurs during custody disputes is a continuation of his abuse although many professionals don’t even consider this. The Saunders’ Study found that abusers use shared decision making to maintain control and visitation exchanges to harass and assault their partners. Even if the father never abuses the mother again, the end of the relationship does not change his beliefs so he will abuse future partners. This means if children are not protected they will be exposed to more abuse.
- Economic Abuse: Economic abuse is an important form of domestic violence both during the relationship and during divorce and custody disputes. Many abusers have threatened their victims that he will bankrupt them if she ever leaves. They often are willing to hurt themselves financially in order to hurt the mothers. This is one of the purposes for aggressive litigation tactics and false reports against the mother. In custody cases abusers who controlled the finances during the relationship use this financial superiority to gain an unfair advantage. Judge Mike Brigner who has provided domestic violencel training for judges says that judges have the tools to level the playing field, but rarely do so. This leads to cases that are decided based on the financial advantages of the abuser instead of the merits of the case.
- Psychological Tests: Psychological tests were not created for the populations seen in Family Court. Instead they are designed for people with serious mental health problems. The tests are based on probabilities so under the best of circumstances the accuracy is 60% or less. Cases involving domestic violence and contentious litigation offer far worse accuracy. A particular problem is that the tests ask questions about a belief someone is following you or fears you might have. In the context of domestic violence, the answer is often yes but unless the psychologist modifies the scoring this is taken as a negative for abuse victims. Protective mothers are often labeled as paranoid or delusional for their normal reaction to their partner’s abuse. These are expensive tests that create the false illusion of a useful investigation while failing to provide any information about domestic violence.
- Failure to Screen for Domestic Violence: The Saunders’ Study found that evaluators and other court professionals need training about how to screen for domestic violence. These professionals routinely discredit reports of abuse based on common circumstances that are not probative. Victims of domestic violence often return to their abuser; fail to follow-through on petitions for a restraining order; and don’t have police or medical records for safety and other good reasons. Unqualified professionals often fail to look for the pattern of coercive and controlling tactics that include far more than physical assault. This knowledge would provide information about the abuser’s motive for seeking custody and his history of abuse.
- Gender Bias: Some of the good judges interviewed by Dr. Dianne Bartlow in a chapter about the child murders made an interesting point that is rarely discussed openly. They said they thought some of their colleagues might favor fathers because too many other fathers abandon their children. Forty states and many districts have created court-sponsored gender bias committees. They have found widespread bias particularly against women litigants. Common examples are holding mothers to higher standards of proof, giving them less credibility and blaming victims for the actions of their abusers. In many cases courts give custody to abusive fathers based on the prediction that they are more likely to promote the relationship with the mother. Once they receive custody the abusers use the control to interfere with visitation and destroy the relationship which was their purpose in seeking custody. Courts that would have punished mothers for far less serious behavior allow many fathers to get away with genuine alienation. Judges engaging in this bias are usually unaware they are doing so, but the defensiveness of some judges discourages discussion of this important issue.
Standard Practices that Minimize the Harm from Domestic Violence
- Skepticism of Abuse Claims During Contested Custody: Problems with the societal response to domestic violence is certainly not limited to custody courts. We have seen child protective agencies refuse to investigate reports when they learn of an ongoing custody case. The few written policies promoting this bad practice have been corrected but many individual caseworkers continue to make this mistake. Courts sometimes discount reports that are unfounded by protective agencies and this is misguided. This practice is connected to the lack of training uncovered in the Saunders’ Study that believes the myth about frequent false reports.
- Minimizing the Harm Caused by Domestic Violence: The ACE Research demonstrates that the fear and stress caused by exposure to domestic violence is far more harmful to children than previously realized. But many courts and even more court professionals are unaware or unfamiliar with this groundbreaking research. Inevitably this leads courts to treat domestic violence as far less important than it is. In many cases courts focus on other issues that are far less important to the well-being of children. For children exposed to one or more ACEs, the best interests of a child must consider what the court can do to prevent the catastrophic consequences of exposure to domestic violence, child abuse and other traumas.
- The Risk of Promoting Compromise with Abusers: Custody courts could not operate with their present limited resources without being able to settle a large majority of its cases. There are many good reasons that judges, mediators and others recite to encourage litigants to reach mutual settlements. This is problematic in domestic violence cases. Abusers, by definition are not reasonable and will not sacrifice their interests for the well-being of the child. Victims are at a huge disadvantage in settlement discussions because abusers have more power and victims are dealing with the fear engendered by their partners. The problem is compounded by the need to find an arrangement that both parties can be convinced to agree upon rather than an arrangement that keeps children safe. In too many cases victims are punished or fear they will be if they insist on safe arrangements.
We now have substantial scientific research that courts can use to better protect children. We have experience with practices developed in the 1970s that unintentionally push courts towards decisions that jeopardize children. After almost forty years, these flawed practices are deeply ingrained. Abusers and the professionals who benefit financially have an interest in discouraging the needed reforms. Many of these problems have not been adequately discussed because the flaws are hidden particularly from professionals with expertise in mental health or the law, but not domestic violence.
How can it possibly be right to attempt to safeguard children:
Without integrating current research like ACE and Saunders?
Without using a multi-disciplinary approach that would include the specific expertise that is needed?
Without considering how the old practices are impacting children?
Without creating reforms in response to the hundreds of children murdered by abusive fathers involved in contested custody cases?
Without making the health and safety of children the first priority in all custody and visitation decisions?
Protective mothers are angry because the present practices routinely fail to protect their children. Judges are defensive that outrageous decisions create a widespread belief that corruption must be the cause. Children who are placed with dangerous abusers blame judges even more than their abusers. We cannot continue to allow outdated practices that support the tragic song lyrics
ONLY THE GOOD DIE YOUNG.
Priest son of former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey is arrested over claims of historic child abuse
- Mark Carey was detained at his home over the allegations
- His alleged victim of his actions, which supposedly took place in the 1980s, is now in her 30s
- The 51-year-old has been bailed pending further enquiries
Mark Carey was detained at his home after claims that he abused a girl in the 1980s
A priest son of former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey has been arrested over claims of historic child abuse.
Mark Carey was detained at his home after claims that he abused a girl, who is now in her 30s, when he was in his late teens and his father was a priest in the north east during the 1980s.
A Durham Police spokesman told MailOnline: ‘A 51-year-old man was arrested on Wednesday on suspicion of historical sexual offences. He has been bailed pending further enquiries.’
A Church of England spokesman added: ‘A 51-year-old priest in the Diocese of Leeds has been suspended by the Bishop following his arrest by Durham Constabulary concerning allegations of historical abuse.
‘No further statement will be made at this time.’
According to The Sun, the family is devastated by the allegations, but the father-of-three not been seen since the arrest.
Mark Carey (left) with his father, who was The Archbishop of Canterbury, at Wakefield Cathedral after ordained as a priest in the Church of England in 1995
Mark in more recent times with his wife, Pam. The family are said to be devastated by the allegations
Earlier this year Lord Carey, who was Archbishop for 11 years from 1991, lambasted the Church of England for destroying the reputation of a celebrated bishop over unproven child abuse claims.
In a fierce attack on the church he once led, Lord Carey said he was ‘appalled’ at the way it handled the accusations against Bishop George Bell – whom he said had been judged guilty without a fair hearing.
Bishop Bell, who served in Chichester for 30 years until his death in 1958, was renowned during the Second World War as a peacemaker and almost certainly would have been Archbishop of Canterbury but for his denunciation of the Allied bombing of Dresden.
Last week Professor Alexis Jay, the head of the official wide-ranging inquiry into historical child abuse,warned that Lord Carey could face ‘explicit criticism’ over how he dealt with a paedophile bishop. Peter Ball, a former Bishop of Gloucester, was jailed last year for sex offences and misconduct in public office.
Claims of a cover-up arose after Ball accepted a police caution in 1993 to avoid being charged for indecent assault on a man while he was Bishop of Lewes. It was also revealed that Lord Carey wrote to the director of public prosecutions that year to express his concern about Ball’s ‘fragile health’.
Lord Carey applied to be personally represented at the inquiry, rather than by the Church, because of a possible conflict of interest.
Professor Jay said: ‘It is possible that Lord Carey, in his capacity as former Archbishop of Canterbury, may be subject to explicit criticism by the inquiry in due course.’
Lord Carey has denied any involvement in a cover-up of Ball’s offending. The 84-year-old was jailed at the Old Bailey last year after admitting a series of indecency offences and misconduct in public office.
Top bishop’s diocese is under fire over a child sex abuse ‘cover-up’ after a trainee vicar raped two Christian girls
- Timothy Storey was jailed for 15 years for for grooming girls on Facebook
- ‘Arrogant’ Reverend Hugh Valentine refused to give evidence in court
- Reverend Jeremy Crossley is also now facing disciplinary action
- Richard Chartres, head of the London Diocese was urged to punished them but did not
One of Britain’s best-known bishops faced controversy last night after it emerged his diocese refused to punish two leading priests in a new church child sex abuse row.
The London diocese, headed by the Bishop of London Richard Chartres – the third most senior Church of England cleric – faced a call by the bishop’s own independent inquiry to consider punishing two priests criticised after a trainee vicar raped two Christian girls.
But the diocese did not take any action, saying it could cause further upset to the victims.
The London diocese, headed by the Bishop of London Richard Chartres (pictured) – the third most senior Church of England cleric – faced a call by the bishop’s own independent inquiry to consider punishing two priests criticised after a trainee vicar raped two Christian girls
Oxford-educated Timothy Storey was jailed for 15 years last April after a court heard how he groomed hundreds of children on Facebook, using his position as children’s pastor to prey on ‘weak, insecure girls’.
Judge Philip Katz lambasted the ‘utterly incompetent failure’ of ‘arrogant’ church leaders to protect young girls – and accused them of a cover-up. Bishop Chartres apologised and set up an independent inquiry into the scandal.
The Mail on Sunday has established that it was concluded five months ago.
Oxford-educated Timothy Storey was jailed for 15 years last April after a court heard how he groomed hundreds of children on Facebook
Its full contents were kept secret, but this newspaper can reveal the inquiry said both clerics should face disciplinary action – even though both had already been removed from their children’s supervisory roles.
We can also disclose that the two clerics – identified in the report only as ‘clergy person A and B’ – are the Reverend Hugh Valentine and the Reverend Jeremy Crossley.
Valentine was Bishop Chartres’s adviser on child protection during Storey’s reign of terror. The Storey trial judge criticised his ‘arrogance’ in refusing to give evidence.
Valentine has carried on as curate at St James’s Church, Westminster. In his sermon last Sunday, entitled Sexuality And Bishops, he accused the Church of treating gays and lesbians like ‘embarrassing relations’ and said religion had helped breed ‘hatred’, including ‘homophobia, misogyny and racism’.
Valentine also works for a young person’s charity, the Walcot Foundation. Crossley was Bishop Chartres’s director of ordinands, and is Rector at St Margaret Lothbury Church in the City of London.
During Storey’s trial, Judge Katz said the diocese was ‘stone deaf’ to complaints from the victims of self-confessed sex addict Storey, and ‘shamefully’ tried to shift the blame to police. Some of its leaders ‘seemed to be worried about the reputational damage to the diocese’.
Police praised the media for finally bringing Storey to justice.
We can also disclose that the two clerics – identified in the report only as ‘clergy person A and B’ – are the Reverend Hugh Valentine (left) and the Reverend Jeremy Crossley (right)
The review ordered by Bishop Chartres said the Church should ‘consider an investigation under the Clergy Disciplinary Measure’ (CDM) into Valentine and Crossley.
It said the Church must face ‘the consequences’ of its blunders.
A spokesman for the diocese said: ‘Legal analysis concluded there were not sufficient grounds to pursue complaints under the CDM and any failed process would cause further pain to survivors.’
The decision followed an assessment by the diocesian safeguarding team, not the bishop.
Jesus Christ 8000 words of shite Quinn just like the queen delivers his end of year speech
this time not as Steved , Quinn IS the biggest liar of all the hoaxers…if you can stomach it dive over to hissssssss closing the book, something he cannie do cause he is a liar….
However I dont hiv time tae waste therefore may I retort
btw quinn no one is stalking your Mrs , much though you may like that
Why is she even on …its just idiots lulz
However I dont hiv time tae waste therefore may I retort
The Truth About MATT QUINN – By His Daughter Sinead
Posted by Greg Lance – Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 16/05/2016
The Truth About MATT QUINN – By His Daughter Sinead
This site was first posted on on 22-Oct-2012 and material from the original
http://StolenKids-HollieGreig.blogspot.com were imported upto 03-Mar-2010.
It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the STORIES surrounding allegations of abuse of Hollie Greig are a dishonest and malicious hoax promoted by Anne Greig, Robert Green, Stuart Usher and others.
I freely admit I was conned into support of the claims, based upon lies and promises of evidence that never materialised. I apologise to anyone who may feel they have thus been defamed by my error.
For details of the background we would ask you to read the PAGE CLICK HERE
Greg Lance – Watkins
I appreciate one should feel sorry for someone like Matt Quinn with his vitriolic obsessions buty if one has ever dipped into the sewer that passes for his blog I for one find it impossible.
It is clear the sad sick little man with his violent and random colour changes and gratuitous obscene language, used presumably to make him seem grown up in attitude but showing him as an ignorant and disturbed inadequate. His ability to distort and fantasise is astonishing as he consistently presents 2+2 as being at least 5 and more often than not more like qo times removed from reality or facvt – I see no point in presenting the corrections and facts to prove them awere one to fisk his rants as he would then be distorting yet more material to feed his sick and sickening posturing.
Suffice to say it is clear that he has lost his temper and made a complete fool of himself in his anger at being exposed and his fantasising about me is provably nonsense but frankly who cares what the silly little inadequate says or thinks! I have never cared what the ill informed and unstable have to say about me as I fortunately do not live in their world of gutter sweepings and I am in the fortunate position that those who know me know the truth and those who don’t, frankly what do I care what they think.
So back to dealing with the facts and exposing the truth:
Personally I have found Matt Quinn to be a toxic, dishonest, utterly corrupt and vituperative low life, with the reputation that if you locked him in a cupboard he would pick a fight with the shelves and distort any issue to support his sad sick self opinion and vicious self obsessed ego.
However he has proved to any but the foolish and the gullible to be a sad figure of self pity and vicious aggression willing to publish any libel aware that his best defence, were he brought to court, would be mental health – showing his long track record of difficulty with anger management and fantasy.
Matt Quinn’s sole contribution to the sad stories promoted by Anne McKay (nee Greig) and her fantasies readily latched onto by Robert Green, George McKendrick, Belinda McKenzie and the band of sick and delusional parasites who latched onto the stories about Holly Greig was that like the other paedophile tourist and sexually depraved voyeurs he would seem to have been there for his own self agrandisement and pleasure in finding others to attack to bolster his personal inadequacies and failures. He may equally likely be obsessed as a means to feed some sick interest in children, paedophelia and abuse of women, one can but speculate – but it is clear from his blog and other articles he is a very disturbed individual.
Perhaps one of the best ways to consider this odious little inadequate is to read his daughter’s opinion of him.
It has been confirmed to me by eMail from Matt Quinn’s daughter Sinead that she was the author of the text in this blog and thanked me for republishing the facts, unaltered – however she has asked me to remove the eMail copy of the birth certificate that was sent to me, confirming it was hers but asking for it not to be displayed.
The birth certificate was removed at 13:35hrs. 04-Jun-2016, as requested.
As a man who actually ditched his own daughter when she was a baby, I suppose he is well acquainted with the damage that a ‘dead beat dad’ can do.”
(‘The doting dad’)
Since 2010 I have been aware that detailed information regarding the whereabouts of my biological father existed online. I remember being in 5th or 6th year at school, aged 16 or 17 and opening the evening times one day to see him pictured standing in front of the now historic ‘red road Flats’, with an article below talking of his time spent there, how he started his businesses from those very flats. His ‘rags to riches’ story if you like.
My parents split when I was one. After a painfully abusive and mentally destructive nine-year marriage to my father. The story goes that my mother returned home one night from visiting relatives in Glasgow, to be confronted by my paternal father and his ‘Mistress’ Allegedly named ‘Linda’. My mother had arrived home early, and naturally my father would not have expected the mother of his one-year old baby girl to return to her marital home a mere 24 hours early. How dare she. He left, or more so was told to leave and his little piece of blonde ambition he had been keeping on the side followed.
After that night a two year divorce/custodial battle began, with my father filing for divorce based on ‘Intellectual differences’ – Hardly appropriate in my opinion based on the idiotic babble I’ve recently found online penned by the man himself. At aged two-ish, After a long and winded lawyer’s letter spat, my father decided that the commute from Livingstone where he resided with his mother, to Stevenston in Ayrshire (Approx. 2 hours away) apparently was too much for him to travel. Now forgive me for being naïve, But I would have thought any father fighting for the right to their child would be willing to make that journey if they were looking to seek sole custody of their baby. Apparently not. Thus resulting in him never to be seen by myself in person ever again.
I grew up, and he was never really a thought in my mind, My mother is, was and always will be a complete champion. We lived alone in our flat in Stevenston and it was there with her that I developed my love for 90’s music. The fondest memory I have of being there was on a Sunday, at aged 4 I would sit on the stool in the kitchen, watching my mum cook us a roast beef dinner, singing along to the likes of Oasis, Phil Collins and of course the Spice Girls. I never remember any of the darkness my mother suffered from. She never let negativity touch me.
Just before my 5th birthday, A ray of light came into our life. My mother became involved with my ‘Step-father’, and I use the term ‘step’ only for technical purposes. He has been forever my best friend, since the age of Five I was brought into a family, with a gran, and ten cousins, four uncles and aunts, and many more to follow. I took on his name at the age of 8 when he married my mum, and have always regarded him as my daddy. He’s been there for me through the break-up of the Spice Girls, My first hangover, He bought me my first car, and this year will walk me down the aisle on my wedding day.
(AGED 4 – My Christening day)
And so this brings me back to when I was 17, Finding out after years of hearing bits and pieces about him, I finally have a clear image printed in a national paper, next to an article quoting this man reflecting on his time spent in the famous ‘Red Road’. It makes a good read, and should be available in all good toilets as optional toilet paper since half of the actual story is missing. My father in fact lived with my mother in the flat, and did in fact start ‘Their’ business together from those very bricks. She would take phone calls, and he would verbally abuse her when she incorrectly noted down information. The photo’s I have, show them happy, Living together with their black and white cats, it baffles me that it went so sour.
Now I must make it clear that my mother has never ever denied her love for my biological sperm donor. She was besotted, and when they finally split in 1993/94 she was genuinely heart broken. She always had her suspicions that he was lying to her. Strange phone calls from a woman claiming to be one of his classmates, His late returns from college, because he was busy ‘filming’ all added to his case for ‘Husband of the year’. I could go on, however I have respect for my mother, and as much as the truth outed would be fabulous for me. I can live with knowing what I know.
Last week I made a discovery, I discovered that my paternal father has not only re-produced myself. He actually has another 20 year old daughter, and a ‘wife’ of 23 years. Now maths was never my strongest subject, Geography and Modern Studies were more my kind of thing, However I am 24 this year… My parents were not legally divorced until 94/95 and something doesn’t quite add up right? In addition to this I also read online that the sperm donor has re-produced prior to his marriage to my mother…. A Chinese baby, born some 9 years before me, 6 months premature – Like me. (I was born at 6 months, and my mother suffered from preeclampsia having me, and had to give birth via emergency C section) The baby died at 6 days old, and had little more than a 15% chance of survival, Soon after this my father’s first partner was fatally killed in a road accident, which I would never wish on anyone and hope to god no one had to endure the pain of this horrendous loss, however, meeting my mother in 1983/1984, The very SAME year you lost your future wife and baby, you would expect this type of information would be disclosed to your wife of 9 years and future mother of your baby….
You can appreciate my further disappointment in the biological sperm donor, when I read on to see him ‘blogging’ about how thankful he is, that his at this point, 19 year old daughter, has been brought up in a safe, secure loving home, and that he has been able to ‘protect’ her.
I ask you this Matt, WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO MY GOD DAMN PROTECTION!?
(FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL)
When you decided that a two hour commute was too much to see your baby daughter? When you sat every 14th of November knowing that it was my birthday, and never bothered to even send a wish in my direction, When you tortured my mother and had he believe she was a fool? When you stated in your lawyer’s letters to her that she would be ‘Incapable of educating me’. Let me tell YOU something, 6 Scottish highers later, and I did okay!!
I have never once longed for your existence, but the fact you have kept a sibling from me, and have potentially produced lie after lie regarding my own existence as a human being, proves exactly what type of man you are. To quote “Matt Quinn is a liar and a fantasist” – I could never confirm or deny if these allegations and things written ARE true, but you can bet your arse I’ve made my own mind up.
For my little sister Amanda, I hope you are smart and beautiful. I hope one day you know you have a big sister who would have loved you, who would have shared her sweets and played football with you in the park. I would have had you as a bridesmaid at my wedding, and would have taught you how to drive.
To ‘Linda’ I hope you never had to endure what my mother did.
And to you, Matt, I hope you know you missed a lot, I’ve grown to be a pretty successful young woman. I own my house, hold a position of authority in the motor trade, and will be getting married this year. My favourite subject as school was Geography, I have a higher in Art and Design, I am a good artist and I studied Social and economic studies at college. My favourite food is chicken. I passed my driving test first time with no minors when I was 17, when I was 6 I thought Phil Collins was my real dad… because he was bald. I have long dark curly hair and one of my favourite songs is ‘Brown eyed girl’ because my mum used to sing it to me when I was little. I grew to be the person I am because of my mother and father. My mother taught me never to hate you, she never once made herself out to be an arch angel, but she told me the truth and let me make my own mind up. She taught me how to love music, and has given me a life beyond my wildest dreams. I have wanted for nothing. My REAL daddy, taught me how to fit brakes to my car, showed me how to spray paint a motorbike, and teaches me every single god damn day the real meaning of unconditional love.
(AGED 23 – Me Today)
Posted Yesterday by Kerryann Logan
Presumably Kerryann Logan is a friend of Matt Quinn’s daughter Sinead.
Interestingly I too have a daughter from a misguided marriage which failed almost 50 years ago – a daughter my wife chose to concieve, after we had agreed to part company, yet remained together out of expediency.
We involved no other parties as we were neither of us involved with other partners either seriously or casually when we separated. I had no intention of having a push me pull you daughter and stated that I was more than happy to bring up the child or cede the responsibility to my wife – however I stated that whoever had custody the other party would not interfere and would have no contact until the child was 18.
When our daughter was 18 she chose to contact me via my parents, who as grandparents had selected to remain available to my ex wife and daughter should they wish. As a result we met a few times but it was clear we had no link beyond genetics and have had no further contact. After my wife and I parted we built our own lives separately and the man she chose to be with did a sound job of acting as father to our daughter and my wife and he are, to the best of my knowledge, still happily enjoying their old age, in the sunshine, together – I wish them all well with their lives.
Unlike Matt Quinn I did not have a domestic sibling as with the young girl his mother effectively adopted, after Matt Quinn’s father had left her – the Chinese girl Matt Quinn made pregnant, I understand.
Unlike Matt Quinn I did not betray my wife by consorting with other women until we were apart.
I do not castigate Matt Quinn for his failed marriage but I find his determination to aggressively and dishonestly seek to exploit the unfortunate failures of others. What a hypocrite this vile little man is!
An odious little man who will open any dustbin he finds to feed his fantasies – I am told he has even jumped, gratuitously, on the tragic murder of Jo Cox by a mentally deranged man to try to pretend I had some part in it – it seems unlikely he had ever heard of her before her death as, unlike me, he would seem to have no ongoing interest in politics and no track record of campaigning in that field.
That the odious little man tried to embroil me in one of his fantasies as in some way connected to her death is a measure of his dangerous instability!
This is the man I hear this is an individual who lived in the red road with Kerryanne’s mother for sometime, living adjacent to his brother in law, claiming grants from the government in her mothers name, to start various different companies! Hardly surprising I guess when one realises he had made his own mother’s adopted daughter pregnant! A fact he uses to try to gain sympathy as the child of this young girl was born premature and died.
This is the individual who can be traced on many sites on the internet, where his behaviour is almost exclusively bullying and abusive, picking fights with people who seek to chat on Forums and the like – clearly such unpleasant behaviour is and has been a part of his personna for many years, one never seems to see him interacting in a friendly manner and he seems to be bereft of both friends and supporters and clearly is incapable of normal behaviour.
I note also that he and his direct family seem to be well spread on social media and there is a sad lack of friendly & normal interaction to be found with anyone. Endlessly self justifying and plenty of TELLING people as he presents himself as some sort of erudite genius – probably as result of his exposure to students as a man amongst boys when he is so clearly a boy amongst men!
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
Documents, Essays & Treaties: https://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com/
The Hamlet of Stroat: http://Stroat-Gloucestershire.com
The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Chepstow Chat: http://ChepstowChat.wordpress.com/
Christopher Storey: http://ChristopherStory.wordpress.com/
Des Watkins DFC: http://DesWatkins.wordpress.com/
Hollie Greig etc.: http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com/
The McCann Case: http://TheMcCannCase.wordpress.com/
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: http://SSOE.wordpress.com/
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: http://StolenKids-Dunblane.blogspot.com/
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.co.uk/
- I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
- ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
- I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
- I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
- I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
- I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
- I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
- I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
- I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
- I am NOT a WARMIST
- I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
- I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
- I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
- I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
- I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
- I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
- I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
- I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
11 Responses to “The Truth About MATT QUINN – By His Daughter Sinead”
Foster boy killed himself after ‘council officials put him in the care of paedophiles’
James McCourt ended his life aged just 30 after being unable to live with searing memories of the abuse he suffered from two suspected sex perverts
Get Daily updates directly to your inbox
Foster boy James McCourt killed himself after council officials put him in the care of paedophiles, his horrified mum revealed yesterday.
James ended his life aged just 30 after being unable to live with searing memories of the abuse he suffered from two suspected sex perverts.
His mum Kathy Johnson claims council officials have blood on their hands and insisted: “They are responsible for his death.”
Kathy, 73, found out about her son’s nightmare experience in Lambeth, south London, after documents about his case were uncovered by a survivors’ rights group.
The disturbing evidence will now be presented to the nationwide inquiry into historic sexual abuse of children in the UK.
In 1982 James was fostered at the age of 11 by a teacher named John Michell who, four years earlier, had been sacked for gross misconduct for sexually assaulting three boys.
He was then sent to live with a suspected paedophile who cannot be named for legal reasons.
Official documents obtained by the Shirley Oaks Survivors Association showed Lambeth council officials were aware the men were abusers.
They even paid Michell thousands to teach James at his home in Cornwall despite concerns having been raised by police, probation and the NSPCC. And as recently as this year the council was denying it had ever employed Michell.
Mum Kathy said: “They are lying through their teeth.”
And James’s sister Liz McCourt, 53, said: “If Lambeth hadn’t employed these people then my brother would never have died. Even today they know they are culpable but they are still making people who have suffered half their lives wait for justice.”
The survivors’ association has found minutes of a 1999 council strategy meeting held to discuss James’s case. It said: “There is a strong possibility abuse took place.
“Much of James’ behaviour is indicative of a sexually abused child.